Takeaways From the College of Law Practice Management’s Futures Conference

Typically, you’d expect an event entitled “Futures Conference” to be a lot of talk and very little doing.  But, that’s not the College of Law Practice Management‘s (COLPM) idea of this year’s “Futures Conference” at Suffolk University Law School in Boston on October 16 and 17. Grounded in thought-provoking presentations by attorneys and innovators alike, attendees worked to develop new concepts resulting in a “Shark Tank” competition with awards for the top innovations.

Early on, presenters set the tone for the two-day event with their impressions on changing consumer markets and the relevant impact on the delivery of legal services. Speakers used terms such as “Lean Six Sigma,” “Next Law,” “TinyLaw,” “Processification,” and one of my favorites, “MPR” (Massive Passive Resistance), to hammer home their points to attendees. Three of the major takeaways emphasized by the speakers were that customer needs should dictate the provision of legal services, not firms’ bottom lines; implementation of technology will serve more better; and resources should be dedicated toward adapting and embracing change, not averting it.

The conference highlighted some prime examples of those embracing the changing legal landscape, including the following:

There are many other exemplars that can be found among COLPM fellows leadership and others who attended the conference.  Indeed, drawing inspiration from speakers and like-minded forward-thinking colleagues, attendees were tasked to develop new concepts that address changes in the delivery of legal services within the two-day conference period.  Resulting project ideas included a mobile guide to unrepresented family law litigants, Skype courtroom translation service, a landlord rating service and tenant self-help product, and triage and emergency service for legal matters.

The challenge now, as attendees and fellows disperse back to their realities, is how to incorporate a proactive approach to the changing legal landscape into everyday practice. Taking a “wait and see” reactionary attitude is the easy way out. As the innovators dilemma suggests, if it works why change it.  But, as the legal market continues to evolve at a rapid pace, success will depend upon by your ability to remain ahead of the curve. Inevitably, this will require time and resources to be devoted to innovation and implementation. It’s a reality that all legal professionals face. Indeed, the future of law practice must be contemplated today.

Featured image courtesy of the College of Law Practice Management.

About Heidi Alexander

Heidi Alexander
Heidi S. Alexander, Esq. is the Deputy Director of Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers, where she helps manage organization operations and leads the Massachusetts Law Office Management Assistance Program (LOMAP). LOMAP provides free and confidential practice management assistance, guidance in implementing new law office technologies, and methods to attain healthy and sustainable practices. She is the author of Evernote as a Law Practice Tool and serves on the ABA's TECHSHOW Planning Board. In 2017, Heidi was appointed to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's Standing Advisory Committee on Professionalism. She can be reached via email at heidi@masslomap.org, Twitter @heidialexander, or LinkedIn www.linkedin.com/in/heidisarahalexander.

Check Also

quantum computing

Quantum Computing a Bigger Concern for Lawyers Than Blockchain

Like other professions, law is going to look alot different after the next wave of tech innovations.